Search found 11 matches

by AMSPeople
Fri Sep 13, 2013 9:20 pm
Forum: Suggestions And Bug Reports
Topic: [BUG] - Does not run as administrator
Replies: 9
Views: 3490

Re: [BUG] - Does not run as administrator

Ok. We hope that you will find the solution to this problem.
by AMSPeople
Fri Sep 13, 2013 9:11 pm
Forum: Suggestions And Bug Reports
Topic: More examples
Replies: 4
Views: 2574

Re: More examples

This is good news. Thank you!
by AMSPeople
Fri Sep 13, 2013 9:01 pm
Forum: Suggestions And Bug Reports
Topic: [BUG] - Does not run as administrator
Replies: 9
Views: 3490

Re: [BUG] - Does not run as administrator

It's a pity! This is my second disappointment after an absence of normal reference with examples.
by AMSPeople
Fri Sep 13, 2013 8:54 pm
Forum: General Programming
Topic: Bunny Hop CDD obscurer
Replies: 28
Views: 51038

Re: Bunny Hop CDD obscurer

Shrek wrote: No because AMS runtme does not recognize anything but .ccd and if you modify .ccd you must modify .exe as both are paired.
You are nothing for me new not opened.
Shrek wrote:This is a good tool.
Use, if you like.
by AMSPeople
Fri Sep 13, 2013 3:03 pm
Forum: General Programming
Topic: Bunny Hop CDD obscurer
Replies: 28
Views: 51038

Re: Bunny Hop CDD obscurer

I just wanted to show that your software does not obfuscating and there is no advantage in using it. IMHO. People have been wanting to get rid of the ccd extension for the longest time and this does do that. In this case there is a simple renaming of the .CDD extension in .DLL? No converting happen...
by AMSPeople
Fri Sep 13, 2013 12:35 pm
Forum: General Programming
Topic: Bunny Hop CDD obscurer
Replies: 28
Views: 51038

Re: Bunny Hop CDD obscurer

You did not understand me . I'm not interested in the source code of someone else's project. I'm just saying that this utility is useless to protect your project.
by AMSPeople
Fri Sep 13, 2013 12:03 pm
Forum: General Programming
Topic: Bunny Hop CDD obscurer
Replies: 28
Views: 51038

Re: Bunny Hop CDD obscurer

I just wanted to show that your software does not obfuscating and there is no advantage in using it. IMHO.
by AMSPeople
Fri Sep 06, 2013 8:46 pm
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Replacing MemoryEx plug built-in functions
Replies: 3
Views: 5634

Re: Replacing MemoryEx plug built-in functions

All right. And you can code ? And then I can not understand some action due to the lack of examples for them.
by AMSPeople
Fri Sep 06, 2013 8:22 pm
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Replacing MemoryEx plug built-in functions
Replies: 3
Views: 5634

Replacing MemoryEx plug built-in functions

Is it possible to replace this function: __PtrToArray = function (pBuf) local tRet = {}; local nOffset = 0; local nLen, pData, hData while true do nLen = tonumber(DLL.CallFunction("kernel32.dll", "lstrlenA", pBuf + nOffset, DLL_RETURN_TYPE_INTEGER, DLL_CALL_STDCALL)); if (nLen == 0) then break; end ...